Conflict of Interest Analysis in Internal Teams of Public
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65119/jspds.v1i1.3Keywords:
Conflict of interest, Public sector organizationsAbstract
Public sector organizations have a vital role in the state structure, with a main focus on community services. Through a qualitative descriptive analysis approach, this research aims to explore the conditions of internal teams in public organizations related to the phenomenon of conflicts of interest. The findings show that conflicts of interest are still a common problem within internal teams of public organizations. Even more worrying, this phenomenon has become an open secret and is even accepted as the norm by colleagues. If not handled firmly, this situation has the potential to develop into detrimental practices of corruption, collusion, and nepotism. Therefore, strong steps are needed to strengthen ethical principles and enforce rules relating to unethical behavior.
References
Arisandi, R. S. (2016). Praktik Politik Nepotisme dalam Pemilihan Walikota. POLITIK, 12(2), 1867-1878.
Bracci, E., Maran, L., & Inglis, R. (2017). Examining the process of performance measurement system design and implementation in two italian public service organizations. Financial Accountability and Management, 33(4), 406-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12131
Daniel, E. (2021). Korupsi: Konsep, Tindak Pidana Dan Pemberantasannya-Rajawali Pers. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Elbashir, M., Sutton, S., Arnold, V., & Collier, P. (2021). Leveraging business intelligence systems to enhance management control and business process performance in the public sector. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(4), 914-940. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-04-2021-1287
Fahmi, M. R. (2015). Pengukuran Kinerja Ma Yasmu Manyar Dengan Balance Score Card (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik).
Hadisuprapto, P. (2000). Pemberian Malu: Alternatif Antisipatif Korupsi, Kolusi Dan Nepotisme (KKN). Indonesian Journal of Criminology, 1(1), 4228.
Kementerian Perindustrian RI. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Perindustrian Republik Indonesia Nomor 18/M-IND/PER/2/2015 Tentang Pedoman Penanganan Benturan Kepentingan Di Lingkungan Kementerian Perindustrian. Jakarta.
Mahsun, M. (2009). Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik. BPFE.
Moleong, J., L., (1994). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nasution, S. (1996). Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif, Bandung: Tarsito.
Nordiawan, D. (2009). Akuntansi Pemerintahan Edisi kesatu, Jakarta: Salemba Empat
Peraturan Sekretaris Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 18. (2015). Tentang Pedoman Penanganan Benturan Kepentingan di Lingkungan Kepanitiaan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. john wiley & sons.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. CV. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2006). Metode penelitian pendidikan.
Sumartana. (1999). Etika dan Penanggulangan Korupsi, Kolusi, dan Nepotisme dalam Edy Suandi Hamid (Penyunting), Menyingkap Korupsi, Kolusi, dan Nepotisme di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media.
Thiel, S. and Leeuw, F. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2002.11643661
Verbeeten, F. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 427-454. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810863996
Verbeeten, F. and Speklé, R. (2015). Management control, results-oriented culture and public sector performance: empirical evidence on new public management. Organization Studies, 36(7), 953-978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580014
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Social, Policy and Development Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
